![]() If you are an organization using Chocolatey, we want your experience to be fully reliable.ĭue to the nature of this publicly offered repository, reliability cannot be guaranteed. Human moderators who give final review and sign off.Security, consistency, and quality checking.ModerationĮvery version of each package undergoes a rigorous moderation process before it goes live that typically includes: ![]() ![]() If there's any doubt whether these CPU:s should be able to encode HEVC/H.Welcome to the Chocolatey Community Package Repository! The packages found in this section of the site are provided, maintained, and moderated by the community. I also tried the other methods of Rate Control but it makes no difference. The issue is seen for both 8-bit or 10-bit output. It's only the 4:2:2 encoding profile setting that has this issue, 4:2:0 and 4:4:4 work as expected. This is also confirmed visually by rendering a chroma subsampling test image ( - note that it requires proper monitoring without any scaling of the HD image). ![]() Inspecting the rendered file using MediaInfo ( ) shows that it is 4:2:0 instead of 4:2:2. Rate Control: Intelligent Constant-quality I'm using an Intel Core i9-13900K CPU with up-to-date graphics drivers (31.0.101.4032) on Windows 11 (22H2) and rendering in DaVinci Resolve Studio 18.1.2 Build 6 with the following settings: So one of the killer features of recent Intel CPU:s (10th gen or later) which you can’t get anywhere else in the PC world (except for their new Arc GPU:s) is the ability to render accelerated HEVC/H.265 with 4:2:2 chroma subsampling.ĭaVinci Resolve Studio 18 correctly identifies this ability, but the actual rendered files are incorrect. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |